翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Imperial Preceptor
・ Imperial Preference
・ Imperial Presidency
・ Imperial Privileged Oriental Company
・ Imperial Prize of the Japan Academy
・ Imperial Productions
・ Imperial German plans for the invasion of the United States
・ Imperial Germans
・ Imperial Gift
・ Imperial Glass Company
・ Imperial Glory
・ Imperial Golden Crown Harmonizers
・ Imperial Government
・ Imperial Government (Ottoman Empire)
・ Imperial Granum-Joseph Parker Buildings
Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd
・ Imperial Group plc v Philip Morris Ltd
・ Imperial Guard
・ Imperial Guard (comics)
・ Imperial Guard (Iran)
・ Imperial Guard (Japan)
・ Imperial Guard (Napoleon I)
・ Imperial Guard (Napoleon III)
・ Imperial Guard (Russia)
・ Imperial Guard (Warhammer 40,000)
・ Imperial Guards (China)
・ Imperial Guards (Tang dynasty)
・ Imperial Hamilton
・ Imperial Harem
・ Imperial helmet


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd : ウィキペディア英語版
Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd

''Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd'' () 1 WLR 589 is an English trust law case, especially relevant for UK labour law and UK company law, concerning pension funds and the implementation of a poison pill.
==Facts==
The Imperial Tobacco pension trust committee asked the court whether the wording of rule 64A of the pension scheme could be varied with the company management’s consent. This said that members’ benefits ‘shall be increased by at least the lesser of’ 5% pa or the Retail Price Index. That provision was introduced following an amendment under rule 36 that said the committee could make amendment following the company management’s consent. Imperial Tobacco had been taken over by Hanson Trust plc, and the rule 64A was introduced as an apparent poison pill, because the previous position was that employees’ pensions were only updated ad hoc and usually below inflation. This accompanied the automatic closure of the existing scheme to new entrants. But the takeover succeeded in 1986. By then, inflation had increased above 5%, and so the committee asked management if they would update pensions over 5%. The new management refused, and offered instead a new scheme of the lesser of 15% pa or RPI updates. Employees holding entitlements to the old scheme, if they transferred would take their aliquot share, including surpluses (there was an estimated £130m at the time). However, the catch in the new scheme was that any surplus would go to the company, not the employees’ themselves. The trust alleged that, if the committee did have to obtain management’s consent to update the entitlements to keep pace with inflation, the offer given was a breach a duty of good faith because it was compelling employees to forgo their acquired rights.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.